Case Studies Assignment Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Studies Assignment - Case Study Example Nazareth Hospital offers services that are average as compared to the required standards while Clinix goes the full mile to ensure that they offer the best. Clinix has immense fixed assets meaning that their departments have up to date equipment while Nazareth relies on the old equipments, but still manage to deliver their services with lesser efficiency. The investments that Clinix has made have attracted immense revenues for the hospital in a period less than three years because the institution undertook its upgrade process during that time. On the other hand, Nazareth offers its services at an affordable cost to those that seek its services hence making the institution to attract a certain percentage of the market. Despite their services not being in line with the advanced technologies, their delivery is still efficient hence attracting those that do not have much to spare when accessing treatment. In contrast, Clinix has invested in hospital staffs that have technology applicatio n skills that are in line with the advancement in the medical field. Questions 1. What can Nazareth hospital do in order to enhance service delivery without attracting immense operational costs? 2. How can Clinix incorporate the market population that cannot afford its services to its delivery structure? 3. In what ways can both Clinix and Nazareth hospitals harmonize their operations in order to remain relevant to their targeted market? Topic 2 Developing and monitoring the budget This is a case study for two principle hospitals namely London Care and Angels of Mercy, which operate within a relatively similar geographical scope. Both of these hospitals are the largest referral hospitals because of their ability and capacity to attend to many patients at the same time. However, the difference that the two hospitals have is in terms of the non-treatment care that the two hospitals give to their clients. In essence, London Care is a public clinic while Angels of Mercy is a clinic whos e ownership is private meaning that the two have different levels of funding. This trickles down to the budgetary allocation for the two organizations, where one is renewable while the other is subject to procedure. London Care cannot afford to treat patients with the standards they would want because their budgetary allocation does not allow patients to be comfortable while receiving treatment. In contrast, the budgetary allocation for Angels of Mercy allows for the treatment of clients with comfort as an after service in order to attract them in the future. However, this does not mean that London Care does not execute its nursing duties within ethical practice it is only that their concern is not on the way that one would expect to be treated while still at the hospital. Questions i. Should London Care lobby for more funding from the British government or should it charge more in order for their service delivery to be effective? ii. What ways can Angels of Mercy use in order to re tain its reputation in the medical market? iii. Should the budgetary allocation be subject to review over time or should these hospitals make the best of what they have? Topic 3: Human Resource Management In this case study, the comparison will be between Fabian and Ethan, who are both human resource managers at TechSoftwares and Apex Computer companies respectively. Ethan has vast knowledge in computer applications and networking solutions as compared to Fabian

PEECLAMPSIA Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

PEECLAMPSIA - Term Paper Example The readings have to be at least above 90 for diastolic pressure and more than 140 for systolic pressure for a confirmation of the condition to be made. The HBP readings should at least be accompanied by a confirmatory test of 300 milligrams of protein in urine. As the condition gains severity other symptoms and signs may manifest, and the pressure may reach 160/100. According to evidence based practice these indications do not automatically guarantee the existence of the condition and a measure on platelets has been proposed as a more effective measure (Ekiz et al., 2011). MPV count, which is a platelet measure in predicting the occurrence of preeclampsia is an aspect under debate. This can be seen in the work of Dadeszen who said that the platelet ratio in MPV is more sensitive compared to MPV alone for predicting the adverse maternal outcome related to preeclampsia (Von Dadelszen et al., 2004, p 871-879). Dundar et.al, on the other hand, shows that MPV increases during pregnancy, but is highly prominent during preeclampsia development (Dundar et al., 2008, p 1052-6). As such, MPV provides a good diagnosis tool for the condition. The evidence-based proposal on diagnostics thus implies that MPV is a better measure. This is also cited as a better measure of the condition’s progression-a thing that the other diagnostic measures cannot offer. The evidence-based practice using MPV as a diagnostic measure for the condition is already in clinical practice and has offered a better tool for monitoring the condition. However, it is not widely applicable globally in clinical diagnostics practice. Symptoms: Symptoms of preeclampsia could include irritability, edema, and sudden increase in weight, nausea, decreased urination, belly pain and migraine-like headache. Causes and risk factors: Preeclampsia’s causes are not clearly known, but there are various propositions that point to various probable causes, which include heredity, blood vessel problems, dietar y effects and disorders of the autoimmune system. Factors that predispose pregnant mothers to the problem include advanced age (>35 years), kidney diseases, multiple and first pregnancies as well as pre-existent conditions such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Pathogenesis: The etiology of preeclampsia and its development are inconclusive. There is some uncertainty with regard to the development and progression of the condition. However, there is potential explanation on the mechanism of preeclampsia. According to David, Laresgoiti-Servitje and Gomez-Lopez (2010), the limitation of blood flow in placenta is cited as a possible trigger for hormone-based reactions, which cause damage to endothelium that lines the vascular system as well as inflammation that characterizes the condition. Alternative explanations from other studies show that alterations in the immune system and maternal. This research-based proposition is supported by evidence, which shows that shifts occur in the immune system in terms of component cells when the condition occurs. Alterations of allorecognition of the fetus have also been cited as a potential causes of inflammation that accompanies preeclampsia (Fonseca et al., 2007). Management and Treatment: The management of preeclampsia heavily relies on a pharmacologic approach aimed at controlling blood pressure levels (Drife, Magowan & Owen, 2009). This is the current common evidence-based clinical practice that is often put to use in the control of preeclampsia. The aim is to keep high